DeepInfra raises $107M Series B to scale the inference cloud — read the announcement

Wan3.0 is Alibaba’s all-in-one video generation model. It accepts text, images, video, audio, documents, and web pages, and it produces up to 30 seconds of 1080P video with synchronized audio.
Production use raises practical questions. Video jobs run asynchronously, reference inputs can be large, and each provider exposes a different slice of the model’s features and bills it differently.
This guide compares the main API providers and SaaS platforms for Wan3.0, with what each one actually charges. Match one to your integration, compliance needs, and budget.
Here is a quick summary of the platforms covered below:
| Provider | Best for |
|---|---|
| DeepInfra | Teams that want one API across several Wan generations and other video models, with zero data retention |
| Alibaba Cloud | Enterprise teams that want first-party access and regional pricing |
| Atlas Cloud | Teams that need SOC 2 Type II certification and HIPAA-aligned hosting |
| Runware | Developers who want first-frame, last-frame, and reference image control through one inference API |
| fal | Web developers who want a typed JavaScript client with queue progress updates |
| PoYo | Developers who prefer credit-based billing with credits that never expire |
| MuAPI | Developers who want polling or webhook delivery and access to Standard, Prime, and Spicy variants |
DeepInfra hosts Wan-AI/Wan3.0-Video as an all-in-one endpoint. One model identifier covers reference-based generation, editing, replication, and driving, and the media array you send decides which workflow runs.
DeepInfra serves the Wan family from Wan2.2 through Wan3.0 behind one API, including Wan2.7 reference-to-video and Wan2.6 image-to-video. Teams can compare generations, or step down to a cheaper model for drafts, without changing vendors.
The same account also reaches other labs’ video models, such as ByteDance Seedance 2.0. A single integration can route between Wan3.0 and alternatives for an A/B test.
Wan3.0-Video is billed at a single flat rate of $0.20 per second of generated video, with no separate charge by resolution. A 5-second clip costs $1.00, a 10-second clip costs $2.00, and a full 30-second generation costs $6.00.
Lighter Wan models stay on the same account at lower rates: Wan2.7 and Wan2.6 cost $0.10 per second, and Wan2.2-T2V-A14B costs $0.075 per second. Since Wan3.0’s flat rate equals Alibaba’s own 1080P price, it fits final renders better than low-resolution drafts, which cost less elsewhere.
Alibaba Cloud is the creator of Wan3.0 and offers it through Model Studio under the model name wan3.0-video. A faster wan3.0-video-prime tier uses the same parameters and media rules.
As the first-party host, Alibaba Cloud ships new Wan3.0 capabilities before any reseller, including editing and extension from the same generation API. The trade-off is a narrower feature set: no function calling, structured output, web search, prefix completion, context caching, batch inference, or fine-tuning for this model.
Pricing is regional. Singapore lists $0.05, $0.10, and $0.20 per second at 480P, 720P, and 1080P. The US, Germany, Japan, and China regions list a flat $0.041256, $0.082513, and $0.165025, around 20% below Singapore at every tier.
The Prime tier costs more: Singapore lists $0.068, $0.14, and $0.28 per second, and the other regions list $0.0636, $0.127199, and $0.254399. These are listed as original prices and exclude any promotion. A separate comparison of DeepInfra and Alibaba pricing on a shared language model shows the same first-party-versus-reseller pattern.
Atlas Cloud lists Wan 3.0 and Wan 3.0 Prime with text-to-video, image-to-video, and reference-to-video endpoints. It shares a unified key with its other Wan versions, so Wan 2.5, 2.6, and 2.7 users switch by changing only the model name.
Atlas Cloud pairs compliance listings with discounted rates rather than a published per-resolution breakdown. The bill runs lower alongside SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA documentation, and both instruction-based and reference-based editing match Alibaba’s own feature set.
Wan 3.0 standard lists at $0.05 per second, shown at $0.04 after a 20% discount. Wan 3.0 Prime lists at $0.068 per second, shown at $0.061 after a 10% discount. Atlas Cloud does not publish a separate rate per resolution tier, so confirm the current per-second price against your target resolution before committing to volume.
Runware is an inference platform that exposes Wan3.0 under the model ID alibaba:wan@3.0. Its overview lists text-to-video, image-to-video, video-to-video, audio-to-video, edit, and extend modes behind that one identifier.
Runware’s schema keeps the controls explicit and catches mistakes before a job runs. frameImages and referenceImages are mutually exclusive, and sending both returns a validation error rather than an ambiguous result. width and height are rejected once an input image is attached, since only pure text-to-video takes explicit dimensions.
Runware’s model reference for Wan3.0 does not publish a per-second or per-resolution rate on the page. Pricing is set through the account dashboard, so confirm the live rate there before estimating a monthly cost.
fal is a generative media platform that serves Wan 3.0 and Wan 3.0 Prime through the alibaba/wan-3.0 and alibaba/wan-3.0-prime endpoints. Its parameter set stays close to Alibaba’s own API.
fal’s queue-based client returns a request ID immediately and reports progress through onQueueUpdate. This suits browser applications that show generation status rather than block on one long request. The thinking and safety-checker toggles give finer control over latency and moderation than most resellers expose.
Standard pricing is $0.05, $0.10, and $0.20 per second at 480p, 720p, and 1080p, the same as Alibaba’s Singapore rate. Prime pricing is $0.068, $0.14, and $0.28 per second. A 5-second 720p Prime clip costs $0.70. fal notes that pricing is subject to change.
PoYo is an API platform that bills in credits rather than a metered per-second rate. Its Wan 3.0 card lists 10 credits per call, and credits never expire once purchased.
Credit billing gives teams a fixed number to budget against before each call, rather than a rate that scales silently with resolution or duration. Developers who prefer prepaid balances over metered invoices will find the model simple to track. The trade-off is that PoYo does not expose a per-second cost comparable to the other providers here.
Wan 3.0 costs 10 credits per generation, and Wan 3.0 Video Prime costs 13.6 credits per generation. PoYo does not publish a per-second rate, so the per-video cost depends on the credit package you buy rather than on resolution or duration.
MuAPI offers Wan 3.0 as Standard, Prime, and Spicy variants. Each variant covers text-to-video, image-to-video, and reference-to-video, with endpoints such as wan3.0-text-to-video and wan3.0-prime-text-to-video.
MuAPI gives backend teams a choice between polling and webhook delivery, which matters for workers that cannot hold an open connection for a multi-minute generation. The Spicy variant produces higher-contrast, higher-motion output from the same three workflows, and the ComfyUI node pack extends that choice to visual pipelines.
Prime is billed by resolution and duration, from $0.136 per generation at 720p and 2 seconds up to $8.40 at 1080p and 30 seconds. The per-second math matches fal and Atlas Cloud Prime: $0.068, $0.14, and $0.28. Standard and Spicy are pay-per-second, with the exact rate shown in the completed task response.
Integrating Wan3.0 means weighing your infrastructure, compliance needs, and developer tooling against each provider’s pricing. The per-second rate alone does not tell the whole story.
DeepInfra is a strong default when you want one API across Wan generations, zero data retention, and a single listed rate for 1080P renders. A similar guide covers the SaaS tools and API platforms for Kimi K3.
Best AI Inference Platforms for Speed & Cost in 2026<p>TL;DR: Best Inference Models and Platforms by Workload The best inference models for most production work are open-weight, and once you have picked one, the platform serving it moves your bill more than the model does. Llama 3.3 70B costs anywhere from $0.18 to $1.14 per 1,000 identical requests across seven providers. Here is the […]</p>
Decision Models: The Fast Layer for AI Agents<p>There is a decision your agent makes dozens of times per session that you are probably paying a frontier model to handle. Should this request go to the fast cheap model or the expensive one? Is this tool call safe to execute? Is the task actually finished, or does the agent think it is finished? […]</p>
From Search Results to Evidence: NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Embed and Rerank on DeepInfraNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Embed and Rerank are available on DeepInfra from day zero. Call Embed 1B, Embed 8B, and Rerank 8B through the DeepInfra API with no deployment setup and pay-per-token pricing.© 2026 DeepInfra. All rights reserved.