DeepInfra raises $107M Series B to scale the inference cloud — read the announcement

Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun is now live on DeepInfra. It's a 198B-parameter sparse Mixture-of-Experts vision-language model that activates only about 11B parameters per token, supports a 256K context window, and exposes three selectable reasoning levels—so you can dial the trade-off between speed, cost, and depth on a per-request basis. We've deployed it at the same competitive pricing you'll find elsewhere, and it's available through our standard OpenAI-compatible API with no special setup.
Step 3.7 Flash wasn't built to win isolated benchmarks. It was built for developers scaling agentic workflows that combine perception, search, and reasoning—parsing a massive financial report in a single pass, running multi-step search loops with cross-source verification, or operating concurrent coding agents in a high-throughput pipeline. That focus shows up everywhere in how the model behaves.
For autonomous agents, execution reliability matters more than raw model quality. An agent that drifts from instructions, violates a system constraint, or falls for an adversarial trap mid-trajectory is worse than useless. Step 3.7 Flash is tuned for exactly this kind of long-horizon, multi-turn orchestration.
Step 3.7 Flash pairs its 196B-parameter language backbone with a 1.8B-parameter vision encoder for native image understanding—not bolted-on captioning, but visual grounding that feeds directly into reasoning and retrieval.
In practice that means the model reads dense visual interfaces—UI wireframes, application GUIs, data charts—and maps them into structured code. When a visual asset is incomplete, it can recognize what's missing, run a lookup to fill the gap, and verify its conclusion before answering.
Step 3.7 Flash exposes low, medium, and high reasoning levels through a single reasoning_effort parameter. Use low for latency-sensitive, high-volume calls; reach for high when a task needs deeper deliberation. It's the same model and the same endpoint—you just choose how much thinking to spend per request.
| Token type | Price per 1M tokens |
|---|---|
| Input (cache miss) | $0.20 |
| Input (cache hit) | $0.04 |
| Output | $1.15 |
The aggressive cache-hit rate rewards the prefix-heavy prompts that agentic and multi-turn workloads naturally produce.
Step 3.7 Flash is available today through DeepInfra's OpenAI-compatible API. If you've used DeepInfra before, nothing changes—same API, same setup. Point your client at our endpoint and use stepfun-ai/Step-3.7-Flash as the model name:
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key="$DEEPINFRA_TOKEN",
base_url="https://api.deepinfra.com/v1/openai",
)
# Text + image input, with a chosen reasoning level
completion = client.chat.completions.create(
model="stepfun-ai/Step-3.7-Flash",
reasoning_effort="medium",
messages=[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{"type": "text", "text": "What's in this chart, and what does it imply?"},
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": "https://example.com/chart.png"}},
],
}
],
)
print(completion.choices[0].message.content)
See Step 3.7 Flash for live pricing and usage, browse the full model catalog, or read the docs to start building.
Multi-Turn RL: A Guide to Getting Reinforcement Learning Right<p>The first multi-turn RL run you launch will spend most of its life doing something you would not call training. You watch GPU utilization sit under half, watch a step take eleven minutes, and go hunting for a bug in your gradient accumulation. There is no bug. The trainer is waiting on rollouts. This is […]</p>
DeepInfra Launches Access to NVIDIA Nemotron Models for Vision, Retrieval, and AI SafetyDeepInfra is serving the new, open NVIDIA Nemotron vision language and OCR AI models from day zero of their release. As a leading inference provider committed to performance and cost-efficiency, we're making these cutting-edge models available at the industry's best prices, empowering developers to build specialized AI agents without compromising on budget or performance.
GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8: Pricing the Task, Not the Token<p>Every GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 comparison lands in the same place. Opus wins most coding benchmarks, GLM costs a fraction as much, pick according to your budget. That framing takes the price cards at face value, but it’s misleading. Price a finished unit of work instead of a million tokens and the gap […]</p>
© 2026 DeepInfra. All rights reserved.