DeepInfra raises $107M Series B to scale the inference cloud — read the announcement

Wan3.0 costs very different amounts depending on where you buy it. Alibaba Cloud, the model’s creator, lists it from $0.041256 per second outside Singapore. OpenRouter lists it from $0.0425 per second at 480p. DeepInfra lists Wan3.0-Video at $0.20 per second and accepts reference images, video, audio, files, and web pages.
Alibaba and OpenRouter are the cheaper entry points. DeepInfra’s broader request schema is easier to justify for multimodal, document-heavy workflows.
Alibaba Cloud prices Wan3.0 by region. Its Singapore listing is $0.05, $0.10, and $0.20 per second at 480p, 720p, and 1080p. Its US, Germany, Japan, and China regions list a flat $0.041256, $0.082513, and $0.165025. OpenRouter lists Wan 3.0 from $0.0425 per second at 480p, which implies about $0.085 at 720p and $0.17 at 1080p under the same 15% discount. DeepInfra lists a single rate of $0.20 per second regardless of tier.
Comparing generations before you commit also matters. OpenRouter lists Wan 2.6 text-to-video from $0.04 per second, and DeepInfra’s Wan2.6 text-to-video model costs $0.10 per second.
| Best for | Provider | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest list price outside Singapore | Alibaba Cloud, wan3.0-video | US, Germany, Japan, and China regions list $0.041256 to $0.165025 per second |
| Document-heavy or high-input-complexity workflows | DeepInfra, Wan-AI/Wan3.0-Video | Accepts reference images, video, audio, files, and web pages through one media array |
| Visible latency and availability data | OpenRouter, alibaba/wan-3.0 | Publishes latency and availability for its single routed provider |
| Managed access with production controls | DeepInfra, Wan-AI/Wan3.0-Video | Lists a public Partner model with resolution, duration, watermark, prompt extension, and seed controls |
Video models do not follow the token pricing that language models use. You buy seconds of generated video, and the price changes with provider packaging and resolution.
| Billing factor | What it is | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Output video seconds | The duration of the generated clip | This is the main cost driver across all three providers |
| Resolution tier | 480p, 720p, or 1080p output | Alibaba’s and OpenRouter’s rates scale with resolution, so drafts at 480p cost a fraction of final renders |
| Region | Which Alibaba Cloud region serves the request | Singapore prices roughly 20% above the other five listed regions |
| Prompt and media inputs | Text, images, reference video, reference audio, files, and links | None of the three listings shows a separate token charge for inputs |
| Regenerations | Extra paid generations after prompt misses or quality problems | A lower rate can still cost more if clips need frequent reruns |
| Provider | Cost advantages | Cost disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Alibaba Cloud, wan3.0-video | First-party pricing with no markup. US, Germany, Japan, and China regions list the lowest per-second rates of the three. Editing and extension are included at the same rate. | Singapore pricing runs about 20% above the other regions. A 300 requests-per-minute limit applies everywhere, and batch inference and fine-tuning are not supported. |
| OpenRouter, alibaba/wan-3.0 | Lowest listed entry price at $0.0425 per second for 480p. Clear per-second pricing suits batch generation and text or image-driven flows. | The listing shows text, image, and reference image inputs. Pipelines that need files, links, or reference audio may need extra preprocessing. Availability near 85% means some requests may need resubmitting. |
| DeepInfra, Wan-AI/Wan3.0-Video | Accepts text, images, reference video, reference audio, files, and web pages. One endpoint can replace several preprocessing steps. Controls for duration, resolution, seed, prompt extension, and watermark suit production use. | Lists a single rate of $0.20 per second, above the other two providers at every tier. Teams that only need plain text-to-video or image-to-video may pay for flexibility they do not use. |
Outside Singapore, Alibaba’s own rates undercut both OpenRouter and DeepInfra at every resolution tier. Teams that can route requests to the US, Germany, Japan, or China regions get the cheapest list price with no intermediary.
Among the gateway options, OpenRouter has the lowest listed rate at 480p and publishes latency and availability data, which helps with cost-controlled iteration on prompts.
If one endpoint can take a reference image, reference audio, a file, or a web page, you need fewer surrounding services. The per-second rate is higher, but the total workflow cost can still be lower.
Testing prompts at 1080p turns small experiments into budget items. A safer pattern looks like this:
The saving depends on the provider. Alibaba’s and OpenRouter’s rates drop with resolution, while DeepInfra lists a single rate, so a 480p draft on DeepInfra saves time but not money.
OpenRouter’s published latency and availability help you estimate the cost of unstable runs. Every miss costs generation time, and every resubmitted job delays the pipeline.
Teams that pass documents, URLs, audio references, and mixed media gain from DeepInfra’s broader request schema, which can remove glue code. Teams that send prompts and an occasional first-frame image can defend Alibaba’s or OpenRouter’s lower rate more easily.
With language models, cost follows prompt and completion length. With Wan3.0, the closer mental model is rendering. Every extra second, every higher resolution, and every unnecessary rerun adds to the bill.
DeepInfra prices Wan-AI/Wan3.0-Video at $0.20 per second of generated video. It positions the model as a premium and flexible video endpoint, not a commodity render API.
The platform runs on bare-metal infrastructure in US data centers and is SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certified. A zero-retention policy covers inputs and outputs.
DeepInfra also hosts lower-priced video models for lighter jobs, including Wan2.6 text-to-video at $0.10 per second and Google Veo 3.1 Fast at $0.15 per second. A comparison of DeepInfra and Alibaba pricing for a language model shows how the two platforms differ on a shared model.
Each scenario uses DeepInfra’s $0.20 per second rate. OpenRouter figures use its $0.17 (1080p) and $0.0425 (480p) per-second rates. Alibaba Cloud figures use its non-Singapore 1080p rate of $0.165025 per second.
An internal tool turns product pages, docs, and launch URLs into short explainer clips. Wan3.0 on DeepInfra can parse web pages, files, and complex images directly, so many requests skip a separate extraction layer.
This scenario fits apps that accept raw links, uploaded briefs, or mixed reference assets from users.
A team needs recurring short videos with consistent characters, style, and sound cues across campaigns. DeepInfra supports reference images, reference video, reference audio, and editing workflows through one endpoint.
The higher DeepInfra rate pays off when consistency matters more than the cheapest draft.
A developer-facing video API or creative copilot needs controllable reruns. DeepInfra exposes seed, duration, resolution, watermark, and prompt extension controls for repeatable regeneration.
This scenario suits SaaS products where developers want standardized generation settings.
A service accepts customer media packs that include a brief as a file, a reference clip, a voice cue, and a set of images. DeepInfra handles reference_audio, reference_video, reference_image, file, and link inputs in one model interface.
The higher DeepInfra rate is easiest to justify here, because it replaces preprocessing steps and format handoffs between services.
A steady monthly batch of short clips with generated audio needs one endpoint that can take prompt-only jobs today and richer media-guided jobs later. DeepInfra’s default audio and broad input design simplify that migration.
This scenario suits teams that expect to move from prompt-based generation to reference-heavy generation.
Alibaba Cloud figures below use its non-Singapore 1080p rate of $0.165025 per second.
| Scenario | Output seconds | Alibaba Cloud | OpenRouter 1080p | OpenRouter 480p | DeepInfra |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. URL-to-video explainers | 2,000 | $330.05 | $340 | $85 | $400 |
| 2. Character-consistent marketing | 1,800 | $297.05 | $306 | $76.50 | $360 |
| 3. Reproducible creative tooling | 2,500 | $412.56 | $425 | $106.25 | $500 |
| 4. Media-rich transformation | 1,600 | $264.04 | $272 | $68 | $320 |
| 5. Production batch with audio | 2,400 | $396.06 | $408 | $102 | $480 |
Alibaba Cloud’s non-Singapore regions list the lowest cost at 1080p in every scenario, since there is no intermediary markup. DeepInfra’s strength with Wan3.0 is input range and production controls, not the lowest price per second.
Apps that need only plain text-to-video or simple image-to-video can defend Alibaba’s or OpenRouter’s rate on render cost alone. Apps that need reference audio, reference video, file parsing, web page ingestion, editing, replication, or driving often find DeepInfra more practical despite the higher rate.
A split workflow shows the gap. Take 100 drafts of 10 seconds and 10 finals of 10 seconds. Running everything on DeepInfra uses 1,100 seconds and costs $220. Drafting on OpenRouter at 480p costs $42.50 for 1,000 seconds, and 100 final seconds on DeepInfra cost $20, for a total of $62.50.
The core decision with Wan3.0 depends on more than price per second. It depends on the workflow assumptions built into the provider. Alibaba Cloud and OpenRouter offer lower entry rates, and OpenRouter publishes latency and availability data, which helps when you iterate fast and cost leads. DeepInfra offers a richer input surface and production controls, which matter once a pipeline moves beyond prompt-plus-image into reference video, audio, files, or web pages. Broader inference costs at scale follow the same logic.
Weigh four factors before you commit: input complexity, expected regeneration rate, resolution discipline, and whether going direct to Alibaba Cloud fits your region and rate-limit needs. Defaulting to 1080p for every draft shifts the economics quickly on any provider.
If your workflow is ready for production and needs the full range of reference inputs, DeepInfra’s Wan-AI/Wan3.0-Video is a practical starting point. If your inputs are simpler and price leads, compare Alibaba’s own regional rates against OpenRouter before you commit.
GLM-5.3 Model Overview & Integration Guide<p>GLM-5.3 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai, built for complex software engineering and long-horizon agent tasks. It handles text input and output across a 1,048,576-token context window, and is one of several hundred models in DeepInfra’s catalog. The model uses the same base as GLM-5.2. Every gain comes from post-training, which is where Z.ai […]</p>
Gemma 4 Model Overview: Features, Architecture & Use Cases<p>Gemma 4 is Google DeepMind’s latest family of open-weight models, released on April 3, 2026 under the Apache 2.0 license. The family spans four model sizes — from edge-optimized variants for mobile devices to a 31B dense model for server-side deployments — with every model supporting multimodal input, built-in reasoning, and a context window of […]</p>
How Open Source AI Is Closing the Gap<p>At the end of 2023, the gap between open-weight and closed-source AI models was real and easy to describe. If you wanted the best performance on reasoning, language understanding, or multi-step problem solving, you paid for a proprietary API. Open models were useful, capable for many tasks, and dramatically cheaper to run but they were […]</p>
© 2026 DeepInfra. All rights reserved.