DeepInfra raises $107M Series B to scale the inference cloud — read the announcement

DeepSeek V3.2 is a state-of-the-art large language model that unifies conversational speed and deep reasoning in a single 685B parameter Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture with 37B parameters activated per token. It is built around three key technical breakthroughs:
DeepSeek V3.2 achieved gold-medal performance in the 2025 International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) and International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI). It is also the first DeepSeek model to integrate thinking directly into tool-use, supporting tool-use in both thinking and non-thinking modes.
DeepSeek V3.2 is now available through different inference providers. This analysis breaks down which one delivers the best performance, lowest cost, and fastest response times for your use case.
| Best For | Provider | Speed (t/s) | TTFT (s) | Blended ($/1M) | Context | Func | JSON | Why Notable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Recommendation | DeepInfra | 97.0 | 0.82s | $0.29 | 164k | Yes | Yes | 2nd-lowest TTFT; competitive throughput; lowest blended price with full API feature parity |
| Best speed + latency | Google Vertex | 199.2 | 0.76s | $0.84 | 164k | Yes | Yes | Fastest generation and lowest TTFT; best for synchronous user-facing applications |
| Lowest cost | Novita | 33.0 | 1.41s | $0.30 | 164k | No | Yes | Lowest blended price; lacks Function Calling — not suitable for agentic workflows |
| Low cost alternative | SiliconFlow (FP8) | 42.0 | 3.06s | $0.31 | 164k | Yes | Yes | Near-lowest blended price; higher throughput than other budget options but high TTFT |
| Official baseline | DeepSeek | 34.0 | 1.88s | $0.32 | 128k | Yes | Yes | Among lowest blended prices; restricted to 128k context vs 164k standard |
| High throughput (#2) | Nebius Fast | 135.0 | 2.13s | $0.80 | 164k | Yes | Yes | High output speed for throughput-heavy workloads; higher price and TTFT |
| High throughput (#3) | Eigen AI | 131.2 | 1.72s | $0.91 | 131k | Yes | Yes | Very high output speed; premium price and restricted 131k context window |
| Low-latency runner-up | Parasail (FP8) | 16.9 | 1.40s | $0.32 | 164k | Yes | Yes | Low TTFT but severely throttled output (16.9 t/s); E2E up to 149s for 500 tokens |
| Enterprise platform | Amazon Bedrock | 45.1 | 1.74s | $0.93 | 128k | Yes | No | Most expensive; restricted 128k context; lacks JSON mode |
Based on benchmarks across 9 tracked providers, DeepInfra is the recommended API for production-scale DeepSeek V3.2 deployment. It offers the lowest blended price ($0.29/1M), the second-lowest TTFT (0.82s — just 0.06s behind Google Vertex), competitive throughput (97.0 t/s), and full support for both JSON Mode and Function Calling. For maximum raw speed, Google Vertex leads at 199.2 t/s and 0.76s TTFT, but at a 2.9x price premium.
DeepInfra is the recommended API provider for DeepSeek V3.2, offering the best balance of latency, throughput, cost, and feature completeness across all 9 benchmarked providers.
The 9-provider landscape forces developers into difficult trade-offs: Novita sacrifices Function Calling for price, Amazon lacks JSON mode and charges the highest premium, Parasail’s low TTFT collapses under actual generation load, and Google Vertex charges nearly 3x more for its speed advantage. DeepInfra resolves this fragmentation — delivering the lowest blended price on the market alongside near-top latency (0.82s), sustained throughput (97 t/s), and complete API feature support.
For developers building agentic workflows, the combination of full JSON Mode and Function Calling support at the market’s lowest price point makes DeepInfra the only provider that doesn’t require compromising on either cost or capability.
If your application relies on real-time, throughput-intensive streaming, Google Vertex outclasses the competition on raw performance metrics.
Google Vertex’s end-to-end response time makes it the mandatory choice for synchronous, user-facing chat applications where high latency causes user drop-off. However, at $0.84/1M it is 2.9x more expensive than DeepInfra — a significant cost premium for the 0.06s TTFT and throughput advantage.
For background tasks, batch processing, or cost-sensitive workloads with minimal output requirements, Novita offers the most aggressive pricing.
Novita’s 1.41s TTFT is competitive, but output generation bottlenecks heavily at 33 t/s. This makes it suitable for tasks requiring large input context with minimal output — such as document classification or sentiment analysis — but developers relying on agentic workflows must look elsewhere, as Novita does not currently support Function Calling.
SiliconFlow offers near-lowest blended pricing and higher throughput than other budget options, but its TTFT of 3.06s is one of the highest in the benchmark. It is a viable option for non-interactive batch workloads where cost is the primary constraint and latency is acceptable.
If Google Vertex is outside your cloud ecosystem, Nebius Fast and Eigen AI offer competitive high-throughput infrastructure.
Both providers clear the 100+ t/s threshold necessary for seamless streaming of DeepSeek’s reasoning tokens. Nebius Fast is slightly cheaper and offers a larger context window (164k vs 131k), making it the stronger choice between the two for RAG pipelines. However, both carry a significant price premium over DeepInfra without offering a compelling overall advantage.
Parasail represents a cautionary case study in why developers must look beyond TTFT when evaluating API providers.
While Parasail’s FP8 quantization delivers a competitive 1.40s TTFT, its inference engine severely throttles during token generation. Taking up to 149 seconds to output 500 tokens makes it entirely unviable for interactive applications despite the attractive latency figure and competitive price point.
Amazon Bedrock charges a 3.1x premium over Novita while offering mid-pack throughput and a restricted 128k context window. The lack of native JSON mode support adds friction for structured data extraction pipelines. It is only recommended if strict AWS IAM compliance is a hard architectural requirement.
For the vast majority of DeepSeek V3.2 deployments, DeepInfra is the recommended provider. It offers the market’s lowest blended price ($0.29/1M), second-lowest TTFT (0.82s), competitive throughput (97 t/s), and full JSON Mode and Function Calling support — delivering a complete, no-compromise infrastructure for production-grade reasoning model deployment.
Google Vertex offers the lowest TTFT at 0.76 seconds. DeepInfra follows closely at 0.82 seconds.
DeepInfra is the most cost-effective option at $0.29 per 1M blended tokens with full feature support. Novita is $0.30 but lacks Function Calling.
No. Amazon Bedrock’s implementation does not currently support JSON mode, though it does support Function Calling.
DeepInfra offers the optimal balance — $0.29/1M blended tokens, 0.82s TTFT, 97 t/s output speed, and full support for both JSON Mode and Function Calling.
DeepSeek V3.2 supports up to 164k tokens on most providers. Amazon Bedrock and DeepSeek’s native API are restricted to 128k tokens, and Eigen AI is capped at 131k.
Yes. DeepSeek V3.2 is the first DeepSeek model to integrate thinking directly into tool-use, supporting tool-use in both thinking and non-thinking modes.
Kimi K3: Comprehensive Model Analysis & API Provider Comparison<p>Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 represents a significant leap in open-weight AI model development. Released on July 16, 2026, this 2.8-trillion-parameter reasoning model has quickly become a focal point for developers seeking frontier-level intelligence with the flexibility of open weights. This analysis evaluates Kimi K3’s technical specifications, benchmark performance, and compares the leading API providers offering […]</p>
AI Spend Audit: How to Reduce Costs With Open Models<p>In 2026, mentions of open-weight or open-source models on US earnings calls and at investor conferences ran about six times higher compared to the last year. The companies doing the talking are no longer only tech firms. PNC, CH Robinson and Siemens have all discussed open-weight models in recent weeks. The clearest example is Tinder. […]</p>
TypeSafe Jev Review: Testing 5 Jobs on a Non-Chat Model<p>Jev is an AI model from TypeSafe that makes decisions instead of writing text. A chatbot like ChatGPT reads your prompt and generates an answer word by word. Jev reads a piece of text, such as a support ticket or a request from an AI agent, plus questions you’ve written about it, and hands back […]</p>
© 2026 DeepInfra. All rights reserved.