We use essential cookies to make our site work. With your consent, we may also use non-essential cookies to improve user experience and analyze website traffic…

FLUX.2 is live! High-fidelity image generation made simple.

Qwen API Pricing Guide 2026: Max Performance on a Budget
Published on 2026.02.02 by DeepInfra
Qwen API Pricing Guide 2026: Max Performance on a Budget

If you have been following the AI leaderboards lately, you have likely noticed a new name constantly trading blows with GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Qwen.

Developed by Alibaba Cloud, the Qwen model family (specifically Qwen 2.5 and Qwen 3) has exploded in popularity for one simple reason: unbeatable price-to-performance. In 2025, Qwen is widely considered the “king of coding and math” among open-weight models, frequently outperforming Llama 3.1 in complex reasoning tasks while being significantly cheaper to run.

Because Alibaba released the weights for these models, you aren’t forced to use a single proprietary API. This has created a competitive market where providers race to offer the lowest price. This guide cuts through the noise to give you the definitive pricing strategy for Qwen.

Executive Summary: The Qwen Pricing Cheatsheet

If you just want the quick answer on where to go to save the most money, here is your cheat sheet.

Best For…Provider RecommendationWhy?
Lowest Price & Best VarietyDeepInfraOffers near-at-cost pricing for the widest range of Qwen models, including Coder and Vision variants.
Proprietary Models (Qwen-Max)Alibaba CloudThe only place to access the closed-source “Qwen-Max” model, which has slightly higher reasoning caps.
Easiest to StartTogether AI / OpenRouterUser-friendly aggregators with great documentation, though sometimes slightly more expensive than DeepInfra.
Developers using RAGDeepInfraSupports Context Caching, which creates massive savings for document-heavy apps.

1. Understanding the “Pay-as-You-Go” Token Model

Before looking at the price tags, it’s crucial to understand what you’re paying for. AI providers charge per token.

Think of a token as a piece of a word. Roughly, 1,000 tokens equals about 750 words.

  • Input Tokens: The text you send to the model (your prompt, documents, chat history).
  • Output Tokens: The text the AI generates in response.

The “Chat History” Trap: For a chatbot to “remember” a conversation, you must re-send the entire chat history with every new message. This means your Input Token usage grows with every turn, making low input prices the most critical factor for cost savings.

2. Provider Spotlight: DeepInfra Pricing

DeepInfra has established itself as the “power user’s choice” for Qwen. Because they run on bare-metal infrastructure without the massive overhead of a general-purpose cloud, they offer rates that are often 50-80% cheaper than major competitors.

You can view their full list of Qwen models here: DeepInfra Qwen Models.

Here is the current pricing breakdown for the most popular Qwen options on their platform:

DeepInfra Qwen Model Pricing Table

Model NameBest Use CaseContext WindowInput Price (per 1M)Output Price (per 1M)
Qwen2.5-72B-InstructOverall Best. Rivals GPT-4o in reasoning. The gold standard for open-source intelligence.32K$0.23$0.23
Qwen2.5-Coder-32BCoding. Specifically fine-tuned for programming, debugging, and SQL generation.32K$0.20$0.20
Qwen2-VL-72B-InstructVision. Can “see” images to analyze charts, screenshots, and PDFs.32K$0.35$0.35
Qwen2.5-14B-InstructMid-Range. The “Goldilocks” model—smarter than small models, faster than 72B.32K$0.10$0.10
Qwen2.5-7B-InstructSpeed & Cost. Extremely fast. Perfect for classification, summarization, or simple bots.32K$0.03$0.03
Qwen2-57B-A14BMixture of Experts (MoE). A highly efficient model that only activates part of its brain per token.32K$0.16$0.16

Note: Prices are per 1 million tokens. A 32K context window allows the model to process roughly 24,000 words in a single prompt.

Why this matters: At $0.23 per million tokens, Qwen 2.5 72B is roughly 1/10th the price of GPT-4o ($2.50/1M input), despite having very similar benchmark scores in math and coding.

3. Official Source: Alibaba Cloud Pricing

Alibaba Cloud is the creator of Qwen. While their platform is excellent, it is generally more complex to navigate than Western API wrappers. However, you must use them if you need Qwen-Max.

Alibaba Cloud Model Studio Pricing

ModelTypeInput Price (per 1M)Output Price (per 1M)
Qwen-MaxProprietary Flagship~$1.60~$6.40
Qwen-PlusBalanced~$0.40~$1.20
Qwen-TurboFast & Cheap~$0.10~$0.30

Note: Prices are approximate USD conversions. Regional restrictions (like Singapore-only data centers) may apply for international users.

The proprietary Qwen-Max is powerful, but with output costs over 25x higher than the open-source 72B model on DeepInfra, it is hard to justify for most applications unless you need that specific edge in reasoning.

4. The Hidden Cost-Saver: Context Caching

This is the secret weapon for building cheap AI apps.

Imagine you have a 50-page employee handbook. You want employees to be able to ask questions about it. Without caching, you have to pay to send that 50-page handbook (approx. 25k tokens) to the model every single time a user asks a question.

Context Caching lets you upload the handbook once. The provider keeps it ready in memory.

  • Standard Input: ~$0.23 per 1M tokens.
  • Cached Input: ~$0.02 – $0.05 per 1M tokens.

If you are building a “Chat with PDF” tool or a bot with a long system prompt, caching can lower your bill by 90%. DeepInfra supports this feature for their Qwen models.

5. Real-World Cost Scenarios

Let’s translate these abstract numbers into actual monthly bills.

Scenario A: The Customer Support Bot

  • Volume: 5,000 tickets/month.
  • Complexity: 5 turns per ticket (sending chat history back and forth).
  • Model: Qwen2.5-72B (via DeepInfra).
  • Total Tokens: ~25 million input, ~1 million output.

Estimated Cost:

  • Input: 25M * $0.23 = $5.75
  • Output: 1M * $0.23 = $0.23
  • Total Monthly Bill: ~$6.00

(Compare this to ~$100+ on GPT-4o).

Scenario B: The Coding Assistant

  • Task: An entire dev team using an AI coding assistant inside VS Code.
  • Model: Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
  • Volume: Heavy daily usage (code completion + refactoring).
  • Total Tokens: ~100 million input (due to reading open files), ~5 million output.

Estimated Cost:

  • Input: 100M * $0.20 = $20.00
  • Output: 5M * $0.20 = $1.00
  • Total Monthly Bill: ~$21.00

Conclusion: Which Path to Choose?

For 95% of developers and businesses, the days of paying expensive premiums for top-tier AI are over. Qwen 2.5 72B offers “intelligence” that rivals the world’s best models at a price that is nearly negligible.

  • Go with DeepInfra if you want the standard Qwen experience at the lowest possible market rate with excellent API compatibility.
  • Go with Alibaba Cloud only if you need the proprietary Qwen-Max capabilities or have strict Asian data compliance requirements.

By choosing the right model and provider, you can build production-grade AI applications for the price of a few lattes a month.

Related articles
How to deploy google/flan-ul2 - simple. (open source ChatGPT alternative)How to deploy google/flan-ul2 - simple. (open source ChatGPT alternative)Flan-UL2 is probably the best open source model available right now for chatbots. In this post we will show you how to get started with it very easily. Flan-UL2 is large - 20B parameters. It is fine tuned version of the UL2 model using Flan dataset. Because this is quite a large model it is not eas...
GLM-4.6 API: Get fast first tokens at the best $/M from Deepinfra's API - Deep InfraGLM-4.6 API: Get fast first tokens at the best $/M from Deepinfra's API - Deep Infra<p>GLM-4.6 is a high-capacity, “reasoning”-tuned model that shows up in coding copilots, long-context RAG, and multi-tool agent loops. With this class of workload, provider infrastructure determines perceived speed (first-token time), tail stability, and your unit economics. Using ArtificialAnalysis (AA) provider charts for GLM-4.6 (Reasoning), DeepInfra (FP8) pairs a sub-second Time-to-First-Token (TTFT) (0.51 s) with the [&hellip;]</p>